Sunday, March 6, 2011

Flying With Broken Blood Vessel In Eye

Truly a crazy idea!

bio in the tank! A (tiny) little bit less to be dependent on the oil companies, it was decided the share of bioethanol in the fuel, from the current 5%, sometimes the very high set at 10%. Sounds good, at least once first. Too bad that the German driver now times seem to be a Ökomobilist. Now, the stations remain at their "Biosuppe" sit, as the drivers now prefer to park at the Super Plus petrol pump. I do not believe that they do so because they were uncertain, this needs only look that is sometimes fast on the web. Guess many drivers feel the true sense of the word "overwhelmed" and have are simply fed up patronized them, too. Rather pay more, but do not join the games of the state and the oil lobby. Recently, is now also the fact that we have, according to the BMW development department, by the biofuel a higher oil-change intervals. The automotive industry vehemently denies precisely, but if such a message is even out ...!
But who really decided that now? The oil companies blame the car manufacturer. They wanted, according to the mineral producers still do not have to build more fuel-efficient cars and found the idea great, a bit of climate change on the fuel supplier . Outsource At the same time the buck but is immediately passed on to the policy. You to support this measure to as already said before, be independent of the oil multinationals. The policy itself again, goes back the card to the oil producers. They would have done not enough awareness and confusion among drivers with it.
...
But where to go from here? Presumably, it gets in the end run so that the oil companies sell back the old "Super". But they would rather pay the penalty charge agreed with the policy because it is their legal obligation to sell biofuels, can not meet. The now Criminal tax due two cents per liter (yet) they then beat down right on the price of gasoline and therefore for them to read the fair. We pay a little more then stop for fuel and the Finance Minister may be pleased with the unexpected revenue. But what is it really politically correct? Yes biofuel? While some increased consumption, but environmental-free? solved by biofuels, once again abandoned arable land from the EU program? But how much CO2 is the "cultivation" of the fuel already consumed? Is it at all ethnically correct, while the world starves to burn (possible) food? And, and, and! On all these issues not only by political action, but both oil producers and car manufacturers. It makes sense it would be like to build cars that have such a low consumption, that such "crazy ideas" are no longer needed. But perhaps the game so all the E10, too deeply looked into the glass of mineral oil? why I now prefer to go hiking as you can see from the pictures, rather than go for a drive. Is healthier and afterwards can also look great in the glass. And beer is organic anyway, even with over 10% - at least according to the purity law!
...
Prost!

0 comments:

Post a Comment